Love, focus, and inhibition of opinion off intimate choice

Love, focus, and inhibition of opinion off intimate choice

Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, Meters. G., Smurda, J., Davies, Meters. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Progression and you can People Choices, 29(2), 119–126.

Hazan, C., & Diamond mГёde Litauisk kvinder, L. Yards. (2000). The area away from accessory when you look at the person mating. Review of Standard Therapy, 4(2), 186–204.

Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, An excellent. (2002). Internet sites paradox revisited. Record regarding Personal Products, 58(1), 49–74.

Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Meters., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Sites paradox: A social tech one to decreases public wedding and you can psychological better-are? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.

Kreider, Roentgen.Yards., & Sphere, J. M. (2001). Number, timing, and you can duration of marriages and you may divorces. Current People Records, 70-80, (Washington, DC: You.S. Census Bureau, 2005).

Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional research out of intimacy, welfare, and you will partnership: Assessment the brand new presumptions of your own triangular principle away from like. Emotional Account, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.3.1009-1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Impact better regarding the carrying out even worse: Public evaluations inside intimate matchmaking. Journal regarding Identity and you may Public Mindset, 87(1), 80–95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: This new implicit cognition from romantic rivalry. Record away from Identification and you can Personal Mindset, 97(1), 74–87.

An excellent. (2001)mitment and you may matchmaking maintenance elements

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automated inattention to help you glamorous options: The new advanced psychology from relationship repairs. Progression and Human Behavior, 29(5), 343–349.

pold, B. E. (1981). Sequential data regarding disagreement and you will agreement into the distressed and you can nondistressed marital partners. Log away from Asking and you will Scientific Psychology, 49(4), 554–567.

McKenna, K. Y. A great., Green, A beneficial. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Matchmaking development on the internet: What is the large interest? Journal away from Public Activities, 58(1), 9–30.

The many benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and also the build from pleasure during the personal matchmaking

Neff, L. A good., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-review motives for the close relationship: A style of around the world enhancement and you will certain verification. Within the P. Noller & J. A great. Feeney (Eds.), Wisdom ents in the study of couple communications (pp. 32–58). Ny, NY: Cambridge College Force.

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the customer-counselor bond from contact regarding connection principle. Psychotherapy: Concept, Lookup, Practice, Knowledge, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The fresh social overseeing program: Improved sensitivity so you’re able to social signs since a transformative response to personal exclusion. When you look at the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The brand new societal outcast: Ostracism, societal exception, getting rejected, and you can intimidation (pp. 213–226). New york, NY: Therapy Press.

Enter, T., & Lydon, J. Elizabeth. (2001). All over the world and you can particular relational models about connection with personal relationships. Journal out of Identity and you can Societal Psychology, 80(4), 613–631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. An excellent., Tran, S., ). Accessory and you may guidance trying to from inside the intimate matchmaking. Identification and you will Personal Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.

Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and certain accessory representations inside adulthood: Will there be a relationship?. Diary Out of Personal And personal Relationships, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. Age., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. Within the J. Harvey & An effective. Wenzel (Eds.), Romantic close relationship: Restoration and you may enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, An effective. D. (2000). Projection directly effect one of partners because a purpose of this new resemblance within their shared enjoy. Identification And you will Societal Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Ramifications of salience regarding extrinsic benefits towards the preference and you may loving. Log out-of Identity and you will Personal Mindset, 38(3), 453–460.

Shopping Cart